March 19, 2017

New Ministry of Testing Meetup! Care to Workshop Ten Minute Lightning Talks? Let's Group Up!

The only way to become a better public speaker? Practice, Practice, Practice!

Want to practice public speaking with me?

Here's my crazy idea: I need three volunteers who want to practice public speaking. We all meet together for a few hours once a week for four (or five) weeks in a row. We each pick a topic relating to Software Testing or Quality Assurance, and work it into a ten minute presentation, i.e. a "Lightning Talk". When we are ready, we present our talks to the Ministry of Testing - Boston.

Yes, it will be scary. For me, the idea terrifies me. Public speaking is a skill I need to learn. We can learn from each other. We can all "learn by doing".

I was thinking we could meet in April 2017: Mondays 4/3, 4/10, 4/17, 4/24. 

Sign up here, with the Ministry of Testing - Boston: https://www.meetup.com/ministry-of-testing-boston/events/238544757/


T.J. Maher is 5 foot 7, with short brown hair, blue eyes, and a red MEETUP sign attached to his black messenger bag. He should be there by 5:45 pm just to make sure there is a table he can steal.

Itinerary:

Would this work? Let's discuss during the first meeting!


• 4/3/2017: Let's introduce each other and bounce around topic ideas that we each want to work on!
• 4/10/2017: Share the outlines we created for the talk, with each of us trying to come up with a good beginning for the talk. (We can decide on a new location, some restaurant or coffee shop).
• 4/17/2017: Each of us run through the first five minutes of our talks. Solicit Feedback. (We can decide on a new location, some restaurant or coffee shop).
• 4/24/2017: Each of us does a run through the full ten minutes. How are we? Do we need another session, or are we ready to present our talks to the Ministry of Testing - Boston? (We need to see if we can grab a place to stand up and present).


Question: How big should I make this event? I was thinking a small group would be better. But should we raise the attendee limit from a group of four people (three plus me) total to a group of five people total?

What is a Lightning Talk? (According to Wikipedia):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_talk

"The YAPC (Yet Another Perl Conference) 19100 Conference came up with the term “lightning talk” at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. The term was first coined by Mark Jason Dominus in June 2000. The practice of lightning talks was first known to be used at the Python Conference in 1997, but was not named until the YAPC 19100 Conference".

Once again, you can sign up at the Meetup page for the Ministry of Testing - Boston: https://www.meetup.com/ministry-of-testing-boston/events/238544757/

Happy Testing!
-T.J. Maher
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub

// Sr. QA Engineer, Software Engineer in Test, Software Tester since 1996.
// Contributing Writer for TechBeacon.
// "Looking to move away from manual QA? Follow Adventures in Automation on Facebook!"

March 16, 2017

Upcoming free webinars from Joe Colantonio, creator of the "Test Talks" podcast

Here are a few upcoming free webinars from Joe Colantonio, creator of "Test Talks" podcast at http://testtalks.com/

3/20/2017: Sponsored by Applitools, a free webinar "Key Test Automation Skills and Best Practices: Recap of Top Sessions from Automation Guild Conference 2017". You can register at http://go.applitools.com/JoeColantonio-March2017_Registration.html

"In this webinar Joe Colantonio - the founder and host of Automation Guild, the first ever online conference dedicated 100% to test automation - will take a look back at the event, highlighting the sessions, speakers and top takeaways.

"Joe will cover the following topics:

"The difference between Applitools and Galen
  • "21 Free Visual Validation Tools
  • "How testing vendors are embracing open source
  • "How to grade your Selenium Tests
  • "PageObjects vs Screenplay pattern
  • "Is BDD just for Collaboration?
  • "TestOps – how automation fits into CI
"After the presentation, Joe will answer your questions in a live Q&A session".

4/26/2017: Sponsored by QASymphony, a free webinar, "Ask Me Anything: Live Q&A with Test Automation Experts Joe Colantonio and Paul Grizzaffi" will be held on April 26, from 2:00 pm to 3:00 pm EDT. You can register at http://pi.qasymphony.com/ask-me-anything-test-automation-joe

Joe Colantonio's Test Talks Podcast

Some of my favorite episodes of Joe's Test Talks Podcast: https://joecolantonio.com/testtalks/

Happy Testing!

-T.J. Maher
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub

// Sr. QA Engineer, Software Engineer in Test, Software Tester since 1996.
// Contributing Writer for TechBeacon.
// "Looking to move away from manual QA? Follow Adventures in Automation on Facebook!"

March 15, 2017

Check out Adventures in Automation, now on Medium.Com!

Adventures in Automation is now two years old! It's messy. It's busy, with text scribbled in every margin. And it's my online home.

It also can be difficult to read, with a layout not as clean as today's modern WordPress formats. I do like the cute little Matrix-In-Blue theme, but it can be kinda distracting.

Because it would take a lot of work for me to port all of the almost 190 posts I have written to somewhere else, this weekend I reviewed all posts of mine and am in the process of moving the better posts to Medium.com at https://medium.com/@tjmaher1... one at a time!

I've scheduled one revamped entry to be posted per day over the next two weeks. Feel free to follow and favorite what you like!


Happy Reading!

-T.J. Maher
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub

// Sr. QA Engineer, Software Engineer in Test, Software Tester since 1996.
// Contributing Writer for TechBeacon.
// "Looking to move away from manual QA? Follow Adventures in Automation on Facebook!"

March 11, 2017

Notes from Dan Cuellar's Webinar, Appium: Prime Cuts

On Wednesday, March 8th, the creator of Appium, Dan Cuellar, gave a Webinar, Appium: Prime Cuts.

Dan Cuellar
"Dan is the creator of the open source mobile automation framework Appium, and Head of Test Engineering at FOODit in London. Previously, he headed the test organisation at Shazam in London and Zoosk in San Francisco, and worked as a software engineer on Microsoft Outlook for Mac, and other products in the Microsoft Office suite. He is an advocate of open source technologies and technical software testing. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, with a minor in Music Technology, from the world-renowned School of Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh". -TestCon Vilnius 2016 Bio

Description of the Webinar, Posted on YouTube:


For the Appium aficionados amongst us, Dan Cuellar, creator of Appium and Principal Development Manager at FOODIt, will cover some of the more esoteric pieces of Appium along with tips and tricks he’s assembled from around the world to help you broaden your knowledge of Appium.
Topics covered in this webinar will include:
-Windows and Mac desktop app automation support
-Preview of the new Appium GUI
-Tips & Tricks from around the World
-Deep dive into how some specific pieces of Appium work
-Q&A from the audience

March 10, 2017

What should be an automation developer's first language? Java? JavaScript? Python? Ruby? Notes from the March 7th Lean Coffee, Ministry of Testing-Boston

I have a question for all the automation developers in the audience:

Let's say you have a manual tester who wishes to become an automation developer. What is the first language you would advise that the manual tester learn?  Java? JavaScript? Python? Ruby? Or does it not really matter?

When someone asks me, I usually say: Java or JavaScript. It feel like those are the most in demand here in the Boston job market when it comes to automation.

Why do I say Java? Because, well, I am probably biased. It's my favorite language. It's the one I studied in grad school. It's the one in which I have two years of work experience. And it is the one I feel is in the most in demand. Studying it gives you good, solid Object Oriented Programming. It may have the hardest learning curve, but I think it is worth it. Work through Alan Richardson's Java for Testers. Purchase Alan's course, Selenium WebDriver with Java. Start reading classic software design books such as Robert C. Martin's Agile Development: Principles, Patterns, and Practices, and his Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Craftmanship. Or Martin Fowler's Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. You will become well-versed not just in automation, but in software development.

Why do I say JavaScript? So many web-based front ends are being developed in JavaScript such as AngularJS and ViewJS, and web apps that are in Node.JS. Automation developers are pairing these web apps with frameworks that are also in JavaScript. See my blog post Learning JavaScript to see links I have collected.

I attempted to make the case on Tuesday to the other Ministry of Testing - Boston members that Java was good because it was more difficult than Python and Ruby... and it wasn't until I expressed it with the other members that I realized how daft I sounded.

They saw my point... but the problem was that I didn't realize was that if someone wants to start learning coding on their own, it might be best to pick languages such as Python or Ruby which might not have such a steep learning curve.

So, what do you think? :) Please vote, below!


Happy Testing!

-T.J. Maher
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub

// Sr. QA Engineer, Software Engineer in Test, Software Tester since 1996.
// Contributing Writer for TechBeacon.
// "Looking to move away from manual QA? Follow Adventures in Automation on Facebook!"

March 9, 2017

How to Signal that the Build is Broken? Look for UFOs!: Notes from the March 7th Lean Coffee, Ministry of Testing-Boston

When developing software, mistakes happen. When multiple developers are working on the same project, the mistakes of one developer affects all the others, so it is important that you make sure your code compiles, that it passes all the unit and integration tests other developers have set up.

If you check in code and merge it haphazardly into the main branch of whatever source control system you are using, errors may prevent the build process that sets the web app to run. Your changes? You "broke the build", temporarily preventing your colleagues from doing any work on that shared project. This is a minor problem... unless you merged in your code just before going home. If that happened, you just prevented anyone who wanted to work the late shift from getting any work done.

If only there was some type of sign, some type of visual cue that the build was broken!

Tuesday night, during the Ministry of Testing - Boston's Lean CoffeeAndreas Grabner, a Technology Strategist at Dynatrace, showed us that there was.

Imagine: You finally solved the problem you had been working on all day, merged your code, and packed up for the day. Heading for the exit, you see this:

"Look! It's a Sign! A Sign that We Are Hosed!"

Turn around. Go back to your desk. Your code broke the build. You need to go fix it.

This is the Dynatrace DevOps Pipeline State UFO.


Andreas demonstrates the UFO for Ministry of Testing - Boston


As Andreas explains it in his March 6, 2017 article, Using the Dynatrace DevOps Pipeline State UFO, "The Dynatrace DevOps Pipeline State UFO was built out of the necessity to visualize alerts, problems, health and CI/CD pipeline state within the Dynatrace R&D organization. It sparked a cultural transformation as it made code quality that we pushed more frequently through our Delivery Pipeline more visible".


Taken from https://www.dynatrace.com/blog/using-dynatrace-devops-pipeline-state-ufo/


You can:

Thank you, Andreas!


-T.J. Maher
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub

// Sr. QA Engineer, Software Engineer in Test, Software Tester since 1996.
// Contributing Writer for TechBeacon.
// "Looking to move away from manual QA? Follow Adventures in Automation on Facebook!"

March 8, 2017

DevOps and Dynatrace: Notes from the March 7th Lean Coffee, Ministry of Testing-Boston

Last night, the new software testing group, the Ministry of Testing - Boston Meetup, hosted its second Lean Coffee Meetup at the Panera Bread in Porter Square, Cambridge, MA. We switched locations from February's Lean Coffee, going from a reserved section of a noisy brewpub to a coffee-and-sandwich shop where it was nerve-wracking for me to attempt holding enough tables for all of the attendees. For April's Lean Coffee, I'll make a reservation back at John Harvard's.

Going from beer to coffee seemed to be less of a draw, which seemed to work in the group's favor. After the first ten minutes of free-flowing conversation between us four, we voted to eschew the usual Lean Coffee ceremony of writing discussion topics on Post-It notes, then voting on the priority and how many minutes we as a group should discuss a topic. We were all having too much fun just talking!

One of the attendees, Andreas Grabner, a Technology Strategist at Dynatrace, stopped in after meeting with some clients. Poor guy! What was meant to be a Lean Coffee turned into our own personal Dynatrace Q & A session, with us peppering him with questions for two full hours, interrogating him about their software development process, their automation process, and everything in between.

For those who missed last night, you can see Andreas speak tonight! Andreas will be giving a talk at the Boston Jenkins Area Meetup  on "Metric Driven DevOps with Jenkins".


Of all the things Andreas said, the most shocking thing was this: Dynatrace did away with a separate tester role at their company.

As I said to him, "That statement just sent chills up my spine! ... So you have just developers do the testing?"

Yes. Everything is automated. It did take a big culture shift. They spent years re-organizing the company. When you shift testers into more of a developer role, it can help them both. Coders taught testers how to code and testers taught coders how to write better tests.

I had to interrupt: "But who catches things such as typos? Bad graphics? Wrong copy uploaded? Not everything can be automated". Andreas mentioned that it is the customer that catches them.

Andreas went on to explain that Dynatrace spent incredible amounts of brainpower how to automate everything: Not just the code deployments, but the delivery mechanism itself. Developers could deploy whenever they wanted. But since changes went straight into production, it forced them to take ownership of production. They had to make sure not just that they didn't break the build, but also that they weren't pushing errors into Production, because the customers would see it. Dynatrace forced developers to interact directly with their customers, which forced them to become more responsive to the customer.

A funny thing happened. Without any filter between developers and the customer, it made the developer more in tune to the customer's needs. Yes, they heard negative feedback, as they always had, but it also allowed them to hear positive feedback from the customers using the product. When they fixed issues promptly due to the fast feedback, or put in a new piece of functionality that customers liked, they heard about it, unfiltered.

I'll share more of Andreas' insights in the next blog post. In the meantime, check out the talk Andreas gave last August at DevOpsDays Boston 2016! ( Official site ).

Andreas Grabner gives his talk to DevOpsDays Boston 2016
"How can we detect a bad deployment before it hits production? By automatically looking at the right architectural metrics in your CI/CD and stop a build before its too late. Lets hook up your test automation with app metrics and use them as quality gates to stop bad builds early!"



Happy Testing!

-T.J. Maher
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub

// Sr. QA Engineer, Software Engineer in Test, Software Tester since 1996.
// Contributing Writer for TechBeacon.
// "Looking to move away from manual QA? Follow Adventures in Automation on Facebook!"

March 7, 2017

The Differences Between BDD and TDD? Is this correct?

Have you ever had someone ask you a question, and in the process of answering the question, you weren't really sure if you were giving the correct answer?

This happened yesterday where I am working as a contract Sr. QA Engineer.

Question: "What is the Difference Between BDD and TDD? Is it the same thing?"

The answer I gave: No.

Why?

BDD: Behavior Driven Development
TDD: Test Driven Development

BDD is a way a business analyst and a QA Engineer can fashion the requirements and the tests.
TDD is a way of software development. Fashion the unit test first, then the code that supports the test.

BDD is using the Given / Then / When format Dan North came up with when working with TDD (Article, Better Software, Introducing BDD, March 2006), that Martin Fowler then echoed (Blog, GivenTHenWhen, Aug. 2013), that the Cucumber people with their Gherkin-style language ran away with.

That was the answer I gave... How could I have made my answer simpler?

- - -

Here is more information that I found while I was doing research:

Why is the famous BDD tool called Cucumber? Aslak Helles√ły didn't want to pick a geeky name. Read what he said on Quora about why he picked that name. 


BDD style had a direct link from Dan North to Aslak Hellsoy, when Dan donated his rbehave for Ruby to the RSpec project and the RSpec Story Runner that Aslak Hellsoy came across. Aslak liked it, wanted to improve it.

TDD, using Java, for example, you would first write a bit of code in the src/test/java branch, then the src/main/java branch, then back to the src/test/java branch as code was being developed. Write the first unit test, run it, and of course it will fail. RED. Write the code to support the test. Everything passes? GREEN. Need to combine like elements, similar elements in the code? REFACTOR.

TDD had been around for a while before BDD. See Kent Beck's Test Driven Development: By Example (2002) or this Wikipedia article on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test-driven_development

So how did BDD come from TDD? Dan North < https://dannorth.net/ > in his article Introducing BDD writes:
"While using and teaching agile practices like test-driven development (TDD) on projects in different environments, I kept coming across the same confusion and misunderstandings. Programmers wanted to know where to start, what to test and what not to test, how much to test in one go, what to call their tests, and how to understand why a test fails.
"The deeper I got into TDD, the more I felt that my own journey had been less of a wax-on, wax-off process of gradual mastery than a series of blind alleys. I remember thinking “If only someone had told me that!” far more often than I thought “Wow, a door has opened.” I decided it must be possible to present TDD in a way that gets straight to the good stuff and avoids all the pitfalls.
"My response is behaviour-driven development (BDD). It has evolved out of established agile practices and is designed to make them more accessible and effective for teams new to agile software delivery. Over time, BDD has grown to encompass the wider picture of agile analysis and automated acceptance testing".

Happy Testing!

-T.J. Maher
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub

// Sr. QA Engineer, Software Engineer in Test, Software Tester since 1996.
// Contributing Writer for TechBeacon.
// "Looking to move away from manual QA? Follow Adventures in Automation on Facebook!"

March 3, 2017

Serenity BDD: An Automation Framework That Uses Specification by Example (SBE)

When someone is demoing a new automation toolset for the very first time, so many questions in my mind start bubbling to to the surface:
  • This is an open-source tool? What grad student created it? What was the student attempting to achieve with this tool? What problems were they trying to solve?
  • Is the tool on GitHub? Unit tests and code samples provided for us novices learning the tool? 
  • What company supports it and sponsors it? Is the tool popular enough for a community to have built itself around the tool? 
  • Is the tool still being maintained? When was the last time code was checked into the GitHub repository? How many are watching and have starred the GitHub repository?
Although the contract position I start on Monday, begins as a manual testing position -- the best way to learn the system under test -- it'll move to an automation position using the tool Serenity BDD

Note: BDD stands for Behavior Driven Development. Read more about it in Introducing BDD ( Mar. 2006) by Dan North, the creator of JBehave, or on Martin Fowler's blog entry, GivenWhenThen (Aug. 2013).

Also, note: I haven't actually downloaded or installed the tool yet, or even tinkered with it. This is just me, an automation developer, attempting to do online researching, and compiling what I have found. I cannot make any recommendations about this tool and how easy or difficult to use. This is just gathering the initial research.

March 2, 2017

Tips for Working With Recruiters: An Interview with Mitch Kurker

Although I have been working with recruiters ever since the dot.com boom, starting my software testing career as a QA Consultant at Oracle's Waltham, MA office back in August of 1996, I never really knew what a recruiter's life was like on the other end of the telephone.
  • What was their day-to-day life like at work? 
  • What did they like about their job? What did they dislike about it? What did they wish would improve?
  • Did they have any advice for candidates on making the interview process smoother, from the phone screenings to the in-person interviews?
  • It's tough out there for manual testers who follow traditional non-coding QA roles. Did they have any tips?
  • And, not to press my luck, but did they have any tips on negotiating salary? 

... As a new co-organizer of the Ministry of Testing - Boston Meetup, I felt it was my duty to found out.

Over the weekend, I drafted and sent out a Google Forms survey, How Boston Recruiters See The Software Testing Industry 2017 to every recruiter I have spoken to in the past two years. Below is the response I received from half of the two-man team that placed me in a position last Fall: Mitch Kurker and Rob Wall, at Modis IT - Boston.




Name: Mitchell Kurker
Title: Executive Recruiter, Technology
Company: Modis - Boston, almost two years
Studied at: University of Massachusetts at Amherst - Isenberg School of Management
LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/mitchell-kurker-21487248/

How Does Your Company Stand Out From The Crowd?: "Personally, I think it is more about the individual you are working with rather than the company that recruiter works at. With so many agencies out there, so many are alike, but so few recruiters are."

About The Recruiter


How Long Have You Been a Recruiter? How Many Years in the Business?

"I'm coming up on 2 years as an Executive Recruiter. This is my first job after graduating college".

What is a typical day for you?

"My typical day is split between working with clients and hiring managers to understand their hiring needs or potential projects coming down the road. The other 50% is spent identifying, sourcing, and meeting with potential candidates for said roles".

What do you love about your job?

"I love working with people. Almost 100% of my business is done in person. I meet with every client and company I'm working with to understand their culture, and at the same time, I do my best to meet with every candidate in person who may be a fit. This is to ensure a long-term match for culture and personality. I also love the satisfaction of finding potential candidates their next great career move! My favorite part about my job is receiving referrals from clients or candidates because this means I'm doing my job the right way and providing great customer service". 

What do you hate about your job, and would you mind if I quote you on that?


"I hate when a client or candidate thinks I've failed them. Everyone makes mistakes and I'm not perfect, but I do my best to handle each client and candidate on an individual basis and give them my best effort and attention. As busy as this job can be, that does not always happen, however that is no excuse!"

About The Interview Process: Got Any Advice?

Job placement can be tricky, from cold calling potential resources, screening applicants, setting them up with interviews, and negotiating the final offers. Do you have any advice you would give to software testers?

For the Initial Phone Screen with the Recruiter


"Be yourself and keep things casual. We are not the enemy :) we're here to help you and learn about you as a technologist and as a person. Whenever a candidate has their guard up when speaking with me, it's not so much a 'red flag' for me not to work with them, but instead, I know there must have been a bad experience at some point that I would like to hear about so I don't give that candidate the same bad experience".

For the Initial Phone Screen with the Client Company

"Use your recruiter for preparation! I do my best to learn the ins and outs of each position, the hiring manager, his/her team, and the overall company culture. This is why we do things in person. Recruiters can not make you a great technologists or give you the answers to the test, but we can do our best to give you as much artillery as possible to 'win the interview' assuming we know our clients very well".

For Interviewing with the Client Company On-Site

"Dress to impress. I always suggest business professional, unless specifically instructed otherwise. First impressions are everything, and appearance is that first impression. Also, do your research on the company. If you're getting an on-site interview, chances are you're somewhat technically qualified. At this point, it's important to impress the hiring manager with your knowledge of their overall business & industry". 

For Negotiating Salary

"Trust your recruiter. Our clients pay us a percentage of your base salary, so it is in our best interest to get you the highest offer possible. At the same time, we understand the market, and this is where our expertise comes in handy. We do our best to get a candidate their ideal target salary, while not pricing them out of the market demand. Be open with your recruiter about what you're currently making, what your high-end target salary is, and the low-end salary that you'd potentially consider after going through the entire process. Communication is key to be sure you and your recruiter are on the same page!"

About Manual Testing


How difficult is it for manual testers to find work?

"2017 is a candidate driven market. I suggest manual testers expand into automation, to be as marketable as possible, but with how low unemployment is in the tech industry, jobs are aplenty for good talent in general!"

Do you have any advice for manual testers?

"Some industries where I see the demand for manual testers currently are in the biotech and pharmaceutical industries. But that is always changing, and so should candidate skill sets. Candidates should always be exposing themselves to new technologies and challenges".

Parting Thoughts


Any Last Comments You May Want To Add?

"I suggest keeping an open mind with every recruiter you have a meaningful connection with. I understand how often candidates are contacted about the next great role - we recruiters get those messages quite a bit as well. For direct-hire positions, you never know when that next great role will come, or when you're suddenly without a job. Having a large and trusted network of recruiters who truly understand what motivates you and what you're looking for is going to be the best way for you to land your next amazing position, or get back into the work force as quickly as possible without having to 'settle' for any old job".


Thank you, Mitch, for the detailed responses! Mitch can be reached at:

Are you a recruiter that places QA resources in the Boston area? 

Take the survey, How Boston Recruiters See The Software Testing Industry 2017, in order to be indexed on the Boston Recruiters page on the Ministry of Testing - Boston Meetup site. 

Contact T.J. Maher if you wish to host an event at your Cambridge or Boston office location!

And thank you, Conrad Hollomon for tapping me to be a co-organizer of the Ministry of Testing - Boston! I haven't had this much fun since I was an Assistant Event Coordinator of Nerd Fun - Boston!

And as always, Happy Testing!

-T.J. Maher
Twitter | LinkedIn | GitHub

// Sr. QA Engineer, Software Engineer in Test, Software Tester since 1996.
// Contributing Writer for TechBeacon.
// "Looking to move away from manual QA? Follow Adventures in Automation on Facebook!"

March 1, 2017

Working with Recruiters to Find Manual Testing QA Positions? Make Sure to Always Be Kind

Nobody likes job searching. Nobody.

It is a stressful time for candidates for QA positions. You might be on edge because time and money are running out. You might feel like you are being placed through the wringer, being under constant examination. You might feel cynical about the process, thinking that you are being treated like nothing more than a big fat commission by the endless swarms of recruiters cold calling you, and you might be easily aggravated with them, and you might want to verbally lash out at them, or give them a hard time.

In a word: Don't. Please don't. Job searching is stressful all around, not just for you, but for the recruiter who is attempting to place you at their client company. Be kind to them. Always, always try to be kind.

On Monday, I started sending out a new survey -- the first one I've ever created -- How Boston Recruiters See The Software Testing Industry 2017. I've wanted to create a series of blog posts, articles, and presentations on the perspective of a Boston area recruiter -- a viewpoint that would be quite helpful to members of the new Ministry of Testing - Boston I just started to help organize -- for a while. I received a response back immediately that really opened up my eyes to the harshness of their reality.